Legislature(2003 - 2004)
2003-02-12 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2003-02-12 House Journal Page 0191 HB 69 HB 69 was before the House with Amendment No. 3 moved and pending. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 3 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: HB 69 Second Reading Amendment No. 3 YEAS: 10 NAYS: 28 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 2 2003-02-12 House Journal Page 0192 Yeas: Berkowitz, Cissna, Crawford, Croft, Gara, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Joule, Kapsner, Kerttula Nays: Anderson, Chenault, Coghill, Dahlstrom, Fate, Foster, Gatto, Harris, Hawker, Heinze, Holm, Kohring, Kott, Lynn, Masek, McGuire, Meyer, Morgan, Rokeberg, Samuels, Seaton, Stevens, Stoltze, Weyhrauch, Whitaker, Williams, Wilson, Wolf Absent: Kookesh, Moses And so, Amendment No. 3 was not adopted. HB 69 was read again. The question being: "Shall HB 69 pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: HB 69 Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 38 NAYS: 0 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 2 Yeas: Anderson, Berkowitz, Chenault, Cissna, Coghill, Crawford, Croft, Dahlstrom, Fate, Foster, Gara, Gatto, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Harris, Hawker, Heinze, Holm, Joule, Kapsner, Kerttula, Kohring, Kott, Lynn, Masek, McGuire, Meyer, Morgan, Rokeberg, Samuels, Seaton, Stevens, Stoltze, Weyhrauch, Whitaker, Williams, Wilson, Wolf Absent: Kookesh, Moses And so, HB 69 passed the House. Representative Coghill moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative Kohring gave notice of reconsideration of the vote on HB 69.